I’m tired of hearing this guy’s lies.
Lets start off by talking about the fact that he’s always saying “Hey, these guys are doing bad politics and I’ll stand up and fight for what I think is right! Change! Change!” He says he doesn’t “Play the political game”, but that’s not true at all.
If he wasn’t playing the political game he’d be campaigning in Florida. He’s not, though, because he knows he’d have most of his party turn their backs on him. Talk about not playing the game, eh? Do Floridians not need change?
Lets talk about the “Race” card now. He’s been playing that since day one, and then when another candidate mentioned race, he totally went nuts on it, calling Hillary Clinton a racist because she said a president had to step up and carry the torch. Come on, if that’s not mudslinging, (which he claims not to do,) then I don’t know what is.
Oh, and lets talk about his attacks on Bill Clinton. It was clear to me that Clinton wasn’t talking about Obama’s campaign when he said, “Give me a break, this whole thing has been a Fairy Tale.” Hell, nobody was talking about the campaign when the quote came through, and until Obama brought it up, nobody thought he was talking about the campaign.
Obama said, “Hey, this ain’t no fairytale campaign,” and suddenly everyone is re-evaluating what Clinton said. Come on, people, it’s obvious that he’s just trying to motivate everyone to see him as the underdog. That’s why he keeps bringing up those “Cold nights in Illinois” over and over again. He wants people to think that it started out as a Fairy Tale and that he overcame adversity.
In fact, that’s why he’s been playing the race card. He’s been using it as a dual edged sword. He can talk about it all he wants, but if any other candidate makes a reference to a black person, they’re suddenly racist!
I wonder if that makes him a sexist because he keeps talking down about Hillary Clinton being a woman?
Lets see. Back in 2005, in an effort to make the president more fiscally responsible with the budget, there was a bill introduced demanding the President not only amend his current yearly budget, but also all future budgets too.
How did Obama vote? He Didn’t. He was there, but he didn’t vote.
How about Abortion issues? He’s been saying that he’s pro-choice, but that doesn’t show from his record. He was present for voting THREE times for pro-choice issues and instead of taking a stand for women’s rights, he instead let others decide without him.
The only thing he did was vote “Yes” on an amendment to add more money to the budget, which was rejected by the rest of the senate.
I hope you’re not hoping for support from Obama if you’re a farmer. The guy just doesn’t have any track record with helping you out. Out of four issues that came up, he only voted one time.
If you’re hoping he’ll help you out on your taxes, think again! Almost half the issues that came up that involved taxes he, once again, didn’t vote on!
So far the only thing he’s shown a real tendency to vote on is appropriations. Business owners better beware, too. He didn’t like voting very much either way about you all, so with him in the White House you can expect a lot of documents to just sit on his desk until they’re “Pocket Vetoed”.
That is, after 10 days, they’re automatically vetoed whether or not he thinks they’re good or bad. This is Obama’s strategy for getting into the White House. Never go against anybody.
In 11 issues on Civil Liberties, Obama chose not to vote.
On Education he was 50/50 with Four of his votes yet again not being one way or the other.
The really interesting thing here is that most of his “Not voting” comes in 2007, as he was gearing up to run for president in 2008. I wonder if that’s a coincidence?
You bet it’s not. He was trying not to step on anyone’s toes so that he could get into office.
What was that about not playing the game, Mr. Obama?
Obama has been in office since 2004. He hasn’t done very much since he got in. He was looking for a quick hop into the presidential office, and then he’ll retire for the rest of his life.
He wants to bring on Fiscal Responsibility? He couldn’t even keep himself on a budget 7 years ago, and yet he’s going to fix our country’s rising deficit? My faith isn’t there.
When you listen to him speak, you’re not really listening to him at all, you’re listening to writers who tailor things for him specifically. When he has to wing it, like he did in the debate against Hillary Clinton, he comes across as bumbling.
Lets talk about his ability to do things, too. He said he’s a leader. An advocate of change. The kind of guy that can get things done. But then he turned around and said that he was just good at getting other people together who will do the work for him.
In fact, that’s all he’s ever done. That’s what his campaign staff is doing for him now. He admits that he loses critical papers, that he can’t actually run anything on his own, and that he needs others to do it for him.
A President is supposed to be a leader. They can’t have others reading their documents for them, or keeping the bills in order. They have to have the courage to stand up and make decisions, the ability to do what they need to do in order to make things work.
If by Candidate of Change he means “Candidate that doesn’t do anything”, then he’s dead on. Otherwise he’s just puffing smoke.
If you enjoyed reading, why not help support my gadget habit?